The Common Un-Good

Americans live in a culture that resists common good. I once worked for a company that (briefly) preached to its employees, “What is good for you personally will be good for the company.” The absurdity of that statement quickly became clear as aggressive office politics and fraud escalated.

In public life, that word ‘public’ takes a beating. Public transportation. Public utilities. Public education. Public health. Public housing. Public lands. It seems any shared benefit is Socialist. Socialist! But no one talks about public harm in the same way. Carbon, VOCs, and particulates in our air. Forever chemicals in our drinking water. A strained power grid. We share these costs in common. Common un-good.

What if we flipped the script and labeled public harm ‘Socialist’? Would it make any difference? Or, would the term be defanged and just come to mean ‘common investment’ or ‘shared cost’ of civilized society?

Let’s not keep two sets of books, where we privatize benefits and socialize costs.